Ipamorelin vs GHRP-2
Both hit the same receptor, and selectivity is the whole difference
Both are ghrelin receptor agonists that trigger growth hormone release, so on paper they do the same job. Ipamorelin is the selective one: human studies found it raised growth hormone without meaningfully moving cortisol, prolactin or ACTH, and without much appetite effect. GHRP-2 is stronger but less clean, nudging cortisol and prolactin upward and stimulating hunger. GHRP-2 is actually approved in Japan as a diagnostic test; ipamorelin reached phase 2 for post-surgical bowel recovery, missed its endpoint, and was dropped.
| Ipamorelin | GHRP-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence behind it | Human trials | Human trials |
| Worth knowing | The phase 2 bowel trials did not meet their endpoint and development stopped. | Also nudges cortisol and prolactin up. Appetite stimulation is strong enough to be unwanted for some. |
| Approval | In trials | Approved · Japan |
| Category | Growth hormone | Growth hormone |
| What it is | A five-amino-acid peptide that activates the ghrelin receptor to release growth hormone. It is known for selectivity: in studies it raised growth hormone without meaningfully changing cortisol, prolactin or ACTH, and with little effect on appetite. | A six-amino-acid synthetic peptide that activates the ghrelin receptor, prompting the pituitary to release growth hormone. Like ghrelin it also increases appetite, and it can raise cortisol and prolactin somewhat, so it is less selective than ipamorelin. |
| How it works | Binds the pituitary ghrelin receptor to trigger pulsatile growth hormone release, with notably little effect on cortisol, prolactin or appetite. | Activates the ghrelin receptor on the pituitary, triggering growth hormone release. It also nudges cortisol and prolactin upward, which is what separates it from the more selective ipamorelin. |
| What studies report |
|
|
| Dosing | From studies
Reported, not evidence
| From studies
Reported, not evidence
|
| Why people take it | Lean muscle preservationFat lossTissue repairRecoveryGrowth hormone release without appetite or cortisol effectsBody composition | Growth hormone releaseAppetite stimulationRecovery and sleep |
| In practice |
|
|
| Route | Subcutaneous injection, from reconstituted lyophilised powder | Subcutaneous injection, from reconstituted lyophilised powder |
Rows describing reported use say what people do, not what has been shown to work. Evidence strength is graded the same way across the whole library, so the two columns are directly comparable.
Read the full entries
Other comparisons
- GHK-Cu vs GHK
- Semax vs Selank
- Epitalon vs Endoluten (A-8 Pineal)
- BPC-157 vs KPV
- Tesamorelin vs MK-677
- Retatrutide vs Tirzepatide
Educational information only. Nothing here is medical advice, a dosing protocol, or a recommendation to use any compound. Comparing two compounds is not a suggestion to take either one. Talk to a licensed clinician before acting on anything you read here. How to read these entries.